Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 243948 times)

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4482
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #750 on: April 02, 2021, 11:51:23 AM »
Lol that’s a bit rich coming from a hawks supporter. Their 3 flags also coming against interstate expansion teams. And if any team benefited from GWS and Gold Coast coming into the league it was the hawks. When they were up and about all of the top end draft picks were going to gws and the Gold Coast which made it harder for the teams below them to add the top end talent that they normally would.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #751 on: April 05, 2021, 05:25:35 AM »
Quote from: X-man
Cry me a bloody river they’ve been kissed on the proverbial with basically no injuries to important players the last 4 years
https://twitter.com/XTweeptweep01/status/1378285132184875009

Quote from: Matt
When Richmond lose Dusty looks horrible.

When Fremantle lose Fyfe is still BOG

Dusty may be the best big game player ever.

But Fyfe is the best player in the game
Quote from: Luke H
Dusty would be rubbish in a bottom 8 side
https://twitter.com/LukePH10/status/1378210504003317766

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #752 on: April 05, 2021, 05:16:26 PM »
Quote from: kyatheperson
Quote from: tiger_lady17
How many weeks if you concuss a pigeon?
if its richmond 0 other clubs 6+
https://www.instagram.com/p/CNReLLqF7ul/

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #753 on: April 05, 2021, 06:33:03 PM »
Quote from: Matt
When Richmond lose Dusty looks horrible.

When Fremantle lose Fyfe is still BOG

Dusty may be the best big game player ever.

But Fyfe is the best player in the game
Quote from: Luke H
Dusty would be rubbish in a bottom 8 side
https://twitter.com/LukePH10/status/1378210504003317766


Must be why he came third in the Brownlow in 2016 when we only won 8 games and finished 13th......#coolstorybro :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #754 on: April 05, 2021, 06:57:21 PM »
Most flags/dynasties come on on the back of one or two superstars. Regardless of whether or not they're BOG on Grand Final day.
How many flags would they have won in the 70's without Matthews? :shh

Not the mention the flags they won in the 80's because the VFL changed the zones to stop us dominating...just like the AFL are changing the rules now to try and stop us.... :shh :shh

...and the Clarkson dynasty side was as boring as batshyte to watch. Uncontested kick-mark keepings-off snoozefest for the most part.:shh :shh :shh

Yep, never thought I'd see the day that names like Riewoldt, Cotchin, Grimes, Lynch etc go unnoticed because we only have one good player named Dusty  ::)

Heck only so long ago we had the best defender of the modern era still playing, but apparently now we are a team of Dusty + sidekicks.

How ridiculous.

If he was that good you'd expect to hear about it but in their next breath they are complaining that Dusty isn't even that good anyway but he's the AFL pin-up boy.

Lol we live in a parallel universe where one player can simultaneously drag a team to 3 flags in 4 years but also be overrated....



 :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4482
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #755 on: April 06, 2021, 01:01:54 AM »
 :lol

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9983
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #756 on: April 06, 2021, 10:08:23 AM »

Lol

Don't forget the 'crap team, good system' one haha

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #757 on: April 07, 2021, 07:35:26 PM »
“Trust me, Richmond did not want to play us [Collingwood] in that Grand Final and they would’ve been giving high fives after GWS got in there.

Collingwood really break down their game and defend really well on them and they really worry about Mason Cox and Brody Mihocek and they would’ve been going ‘GWS just handed us the flag’.”

- Matt Rendell on SEN

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/04/07/it-cost-them-a-grand-final-spot-rendell-frustrated-with-conservative-magpies/

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #758 on: April 07, 2021, 07:43:27 PM »


"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #759 on: April 11, 2021, 08:14:18 PM »
Quote from: benlee1979
Richmond fans nowhere to be seen between 1980 and 2016. Only there for the good times, will disappear again once their glory days are over

I guess that’s where Essendon fans are different we always attend and stay members even when we’re pinned to the bottom ✈️🛫🚀
https://twitter.com/benlee1979/with_replies

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #760 on: April 14, 2021, 03:40:05 PM »
Quote from: kaiserchief13
They changed the rules to make games better viewing with more goals. The way Richmond played over the past 4-5 years is not meant to be how the game should be played

The game is meant to be open, free flowing with big marks. Richmonds style is hold, tackle and try and force a turnover then rush the ball forward like a rugby game

Quote from: Lavender bushranger
Richmond winning didn't concern me. Their supporters are battlers and I don't begrudge them having some joy in their lives.

It was their style of play. The suffocation of the traditional and core skills of AFL footy that made them unwatchable.

The only thing that made them even remotely watchable was Dustin Martin.

Quote from: Obeanie1
Richmond's game plan is to flood back, not really attempt to contest in the forward line or midfield, just slow play down and set up their defense. Then cause a turnover and surge forward with chaos ball movement as fast as possible.

That isn't how football traditionally was played. Traditionally it was man on man. Mids v mids and forwards v backs. No flooding, no zones and no chaos ball movement.

Man on man. Tall v tall. Small v small.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/lindrum-tigers-were-the-new-rule-changes-brought-in-to-curtail-richmonds-dominance.1261401/



Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #761 on: April 14, 2021, 03:49:16 PM »
Most flags/dynasties come on on the back of one or two superstars. Regardless of whether or not they're BOG on Grand Final day.
How many flags would they have won in the 70's without Matthews? :shh

Not the mention the flags they won in the 80's because the VFL changed the zones to stop us dominating...just like the AFL are changing the rules now to try and stop us.... :shh :shh

...and the Clarkson dynasty side was as boring as batshyte to watch. Uncontested kick-mark keepings-off snoozefest for the most part.:shh :shh :shh

Yep, never thought I'd see the day that names like Riewoldt, Cotchin, Grimes, Lynch etc go unnoticed because we only have one good player named Dusty  ::)

Heck only so long ago we had the best defender of the modern era still playing, but apparently now we are a team of Dusty + sidekicks.

How ridiculous.

If he was that good you'd expect to hear about it but in their next breath they are complaining that Dusty isn't even that good anyway but he's the AFL pin-up boy.

Lol we live in a parallel universe where one player can simultaneously drag a team to 3 flags in 4 years but also be overrated....



 :shh


 :lol spot on.

These clowns are hilarious.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #762 on: April 16, 2021, 04:07:40 AM »
Quote from: Nicholas
Next 3 rounds for @Richmond_FC are at the MCG protected much.... no not at all. God for bit if they should travel out side of Melbourne @AFL
Quote from: Nicholas
If every @AFL team was as protected as @Richmond_FC not travelling anywhere, everyone would win, I think all remaining rounds for @Richmond_FC are at home at the MCG
https://twitter.com/Sbroia91


Quote from: Luke
new richmond colours


https://twitter.com/lukedontcare_/status/1382667987157585926

Quote from: Sheldon Peters
It's amazing how much more unlikeable Lynch became since he went to Richmond. Got to love guys that can only give it out when they are playing in better teams.
https://twitter.com/ZoBlitz/status/1382659444866043906

Quote from: Jis Chrudd
Things that are more likeable than Tom Lynch include warm beer, light beer, warm light beer and razor blade sandwiches. #AFLSaintsTigers
https://twitter.com/JisChrudd/status/1382661336308457478

Quote from: Ben Jammin' (I play music)
Richmond playing American Football instead the amount they're throwing it
https://twitter.com/FasterPP3/status/1382659968524972033

Quote from: AFL Opinions
I'll say it now Richmond sorry to say play boring footy, they always had and always will. The game is boring the commentary is so horrible. And ill say it they favor dusty way too much. Agian ill use the word, boring plain boring. #AFLSaintsTigers #AFL
https://twitter.com/AFLOpinions1/status/1382660099752165381

Quote from: Lisa B
So f***** bored with Richmond. Same bored I was when Hawthorn kept winning. My soft spot for them has died completely...
https://twitter.com/LisaB_29/status/1382657811046309888

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9983
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #763 on: April 16, 2021, 06:34:42 AM »
Quote from: Lisa B
So f***** bored with Richmond. Same bored I was when Hawthorn kept winning. My soft spot for them has died completely...
https://twitter.com/LisaB_29/status/1382657811046309888

This last one gives me a stiffy

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #764 on: April 17, 2021, 05:05:40 PM »
Quote from: peter ryan
This is the eighth time Collingwood has played West Coast since 2018. In same time Richmond has played the Eagles just three times.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
And in that time, Richmond played WC in Perth only ONCE. Incredible, inexplicable fixturing.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Wrong. WC have played Richmond at the MCG twice in that timeframe.

What’s interesting is that Richmond got absolutely belted on the one occasion they travelled and played the Eagles in Perth in the past 3 years.
Ed. West Coast has only played us once at the 'G since 2018.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Actually you’re correct, my bad. Begs the question: why have the two most recent premiers played each other so few times?

Unlike Richmond with Perth games, WC want as many MCG games as possible.

Richmond have a knack of avoiding interstate travel. It’s uncanny.
Quote from: Neil Stewart
FOURTEEN games at the MCG (not including finals) scheduled for this year.

NINE out of their last TEN games including the GF at the MCG in lead up to their 2019 flag.

Dream run.
Quote from: PIZ
you do realise there are such things as co-tenants? Where else should they play?
Quote from: Neil Stewart
At the other most recent premiership winner’s home ground once a season?

Like they were fixtured to last year, but bitched out on by lobbying the AFL to move the game to QLD, resulting in a probable 8 premiership point swing that effectively secured top 4 for them.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1383220547832619013