Author Topic: Tom Lynch [merged]  (Read 506660 times)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2415 on: September 14, 2024, 03:28:06 PM »
Lynchy turns 32 next month.
I have long been in the keep him camp. I still am. My concern is the injuries and i ask myself how many more years will we have him for? and is he just one injury away from the end.

If the answer is one year to q1 and one injury is the answer to q2 then you have to at least ask is it worth our while looking at a  trade if he was up for it. Only if he wanted it. A circumstance of say he is going to a club that will give him a shot at a flag one last hurrah if you like.

Keep Lynch as we need the structure he brings ( it has been sadly missed )

We also need to get him to 100 games. (11 more)

Sadly that structure he brings may only be for one year.

With his age and injuries we do need to find and get games into  two quality key forwards.

Might mean we are a bit tall fwd but it needs to be done imo.



Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3743
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2416 on: September 14, 2024, 05:58:04 PM »
Lynchy turns 32 next month.
I have long been in the keep him camp. I still am. My concern is the injuries and i ask myself how many more years will we have him for? and is he just one injury away from the end.

If the answer is one year to q1 and one injury is the answer to q2 then you have to at least ask is it worth our while looking at a  trade if he was up for it. Only if he wanted it. A circumstance of say he is going to a club that will give him a shot at a flag one last hurrah if you like.

Keep Lynch as we need the structure he brings ( it has been sadly missed )

We also need to get him to 100 games. (11 more)

Sadly that structure he brings may only be for one year.

With his age and injuries we do need to find and get games into  two quality key forwards.

Might mean we are a bit tall fwd but it needs to be done imo.
If Cumberland Bauer and Fawcett were any good they would be a compelling front structure…..

Offline RedanTiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2417 on: September 15, 2024, 06:52:03 PM »
I've had the idea in my head for a while that a new forward structure may be useful.

In contrast to the usual forward line of only one or two key forwards we could, with our current list, put out a forward line that has two bigs across half-forward - say Fawcett, Armstrong and Bauer, Lefau and one small like Mansell, Clarke or Campbell. Then a full forward line with one big - currently Lynch but later a draft pick like Whitlock and two smalls like Coulthard, Rioli, Green and O'Sullivan.

What would be different is the half forward line plays with the bigs on the outside funneling to the corridor and goals.
The smalls go anywhere including into midfield on turnovers with the hope they can stretch slower backs with endurance and speed.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2418 on: September 17, 2024, 03:39:37 PM »
Lynchy turns 32 next month.
I have long been in the keep him camp. I still am. My concern is the injuries and i ask myself how many more years will we have him for? and is he just one injury away from the end.

If the answer is one year to q1 and one injury is the answer to q2 then you have to at least ask is it worth our while looking at a  trade if he was up for it. Only if he wanted it. A circumstance of say he is going to a club that will give him a shot at a flag one last hurrah if you like.

Keep Lynch as we need the structure he brings ( it has been sadly missed )

We also need to get him to 100 games. (11 more)

Sadly that structure he brings may only be for one year.

With his age and injuries we do need to find and get games into  two quality key forwards.

Might mean we are a bit tall fwd but it needs to be done imo.
If Cumberland Bauer and Fawcett were any good they would be a compelling front structure…..

IF IF IF. If this and if that freakin ifs everywhere.
We might not be so iffy if we actually took some talls earlier in the nd.

What are the odds of a pick after pick 40, or rookie psd or msd drafts.
We could have 8 kpfs on the list taken there and only find if we get lucky two okay types.

Cumberland is 24 and has not done anywhere near enough be retained.

Bauer well he shows some good attributes but like so many draftees we have drafted he hardly touches the ball. It seems that is also the case when in the vfl.

Fawcett who the hell knows what was he pick 43 or something been injured but how many picks in the 40"s make it.

Our list of key/Tall  forwards lets not put our head in the sand about where we have taken them.

Lynch   32 pick 11
Lefau   26 ssp rookie
Kossie  24 pick  52
Ryan    24  pick 40 ruck/fwd
Bauer   22 msd rookie.
Gray    21  msd rookie
Fawcett  19 pick 43

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3743
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2419 on: September 17, 2024, 05:11:07 PM »
Lynchy turns 32 next month.
I have long been in the keep him camp. I still am. My concern is the injuries and i ask myself how many more years will we have him for? and is he just one injury away from the end.

If the answer is one year to q1 and one injury is the answer to q2 then you have to at least ask is it worth our while looking at a  trade if he was up for it. Only if he wanted it. A circumstance of say he is going to a club that will give him a shot at a flag one last hurrah if you like.

Keep Lynch as we need the structure he brings ( it has been sadly missed )

We also need to get him to 100 games. (11 more)

Sadly that structure he brings may only be for one year.

With his age and injuries we do need to find and get games into  two quality key forwards.

Might mean we are a bit tall fwd but it needs to be done imo.
If Cumberland Bauer and Fawcett were any good they would be a compelling front structure…..

IF IF IF. If this and if that freakin ifs everywhere.
We might not be so iffy if we actually took some talls earlier in the nd.

What are the odds of a pick after pick 40, or rookie psd or msd drafts.
We could have 8 kpfs on the list taken there and only find if we get lucky two okay types.

Cumberland is 24 and has not done anywhere near enough be retained.

Bauer well he shows some good attributes but like so many draftees we have drafted he hardly touches the ball. It seems that is also the case when in the vfl.

Fawcett who the hell knows what was he pick 43 or something been injured but how many picks in the 40"s make it.

Our list of key/Tall  forwards lets not put our head in the sand about where we have taken them.

Lynch   32 pick 11
Lefau   26 ssp rookie
Kossie  24 pick  52
Ryan    24  pick 40 ruck/fwd
Bauer   22 msd rookie.
Gray    21  msd rookie
Fawcett  19 pick 43
As always you got it.
My major problem is I am a glass half full theorist

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19424
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2420 on: September 17, 2024, 06:07:49 PM »
The glass is half full if it you just poured it and half empty if you just drank it... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3743
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2421 on: September 17, 2024, 08:08:30 PM »
The glass is half full if it you just poured it and half empty if you just drank it... :shh
😂😂

Offline Hart4Jack

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2422 on: September 17, 2024, 08:59:34 PM »
The glass is half full if it you just poured it and half empty if you just drank it... :shh
😂😂

Or you were a miserable burger & didn't fill the glass. :snidegrin

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2423 on: September 22, 2024, 08:10:28 PM »
As .much as we miss a fit Lynch as a forward. It's the lead up target that is missing so badly.

Watching the finals. So often Jesse Hogan, Joe Daniher, Jeremy Cameron were high up the ground on the wing, taking a mark and holding up play to allow the flood / cluster / defense to get out of the back 50 and get forward.

Too often did we struggle to get the ball out of the backline and into our forwards with any sort of control because we struggled not having 1 let alone 2 lead up players to take a mark and hold up play on the wings.
Go Tigers!

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98225
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2424 on: October 01, 2024, 08:16:54 PM »
Lynch told Tom Morris that he'll be at Richmond next year and has already started training.

Go to 1.15 min mark: https://x.com/9NewsMelb/status/1841037748313968926

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2425 on: October 01, 2024, 09:45:32 PM »
Lynch told Tom Morris that he'll be at Richmond next year and has already started training.

Go to 1.15 min mark: https://x.com/9NewsMelb/status/1841037748313968926

I think this is good.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2426 on: October 02, 2024, 10:30:39 AM »
So do I , he would be a great mentor for any new key forwards we recruit, I hope we get one in the 1st round instead of waiting to rookie one , quality is not a subsistence for quality

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98225
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2427 on: October 03, 2024, 04:07:49 PM »
"There's a guy who has played eight games in two years, he's a two time Premiership player and his name is Tom Lynch.

I know he's on $1.4million a year on a back-ended contract, but he is the type of player I would be at least talking about internally if I was Brisbane."

-Damian Barrett on replacing Joe Daniher

https://x.com/traderadio/status/1841711702246883429

Got to love the media making things up just so they have something to say  :sleep

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4493
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2428 on: October 03, 2024, 04:42:41 PM »
"There's a guy who has played eight games in two years, he's a two time Premiership player and his name is Tom Lynch.

I know he's on $1.4million a year on a back-ended contract, but he is the type of player I would be at least talking about internally if I was Brisbane."

-Damian Barrett on replacing Joe Daniher

https://x.com/traderadio/status/1841711702246883429

Got to love the media making things up just so they have something to say  :sleep

I agree with him. Brisbane should be discussing him internally and doing their due diligence. Barrett (whom I don't like BTW) paid to provide an opinion and that's all he did.
The media hate can get a little ridiculous at times. You all forget, no media, no AFL.

If he was making outlandish claims, different. But what on Earth has he said here that can be offensive or wrong in any way?

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Tom Lynch [merged]
« Reply #2429 on: October 03, 2024, 04:50:25 PM »
Barrett must know something Tom Lynch doesn’t , as Lynch said he wasn’t going anywhere?